Blog Home  Sign In RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0 CDF  

  def Softwaremaker() :
         return "William Tay", "<Challenging Conventions />"

  knownType_Serialize, about = Softwaremaker()
 

 Thursday, October 05, 2006

This little interview I had done with INETA APAC just got published here.

Up Close with .Net Leaders

In this issue, we get up close and personal with William Tay (Microsoft Regional Director based in Singapore) to understand what makes him tick and his passions.

Check out his blog at
http://www.softwaremaker.net/blog

William Tay
Microsoft Regional Director

MVP (Solutions Architect)

 


 

1. What are your visions for INETA APAC?
My vision for INETA APAC is simple. I would like it to be the de-factor facilitator for the birth and co-ordination of usergroups in this region. In addition, I would love for it to add value to the younger usergroups by providing mentorship and guidance to their leaders as well as providing the in-between services to help usergroups grow to reach their potential.


2. What does being a MSRD mean to you?
It means being part of a closely-knitted group of independent Microsoft experts and professionals around the world and being that bridge between the product groups in Redmond and the read world.

3. What do you think will be the next killer application?
Great question. Surprisingly, I think a non-new application will be the next killer application. With the proliferation of the internet as a platform today, it is key that the mass-consumed killer application must be of a non-intrusive technology and instead work on top of the Internet to bring out its best. Any application/technology that re-invents itself by plugging the current holes as-is today deserves a shot to be the killer application, and it must not be limited to platform of choice. I think Cardspace and the propogation of the Federated Identities and the Metasystem on ALL platforms is my next killer application. If I have my way today - I will kill off all disparate identity systems, especially passwords and all those password minder / digital wallet systems that prey on top of the fact that security and human convenience is, most often, oxymoron to each other. What they are doing is essentially breeding more chaos into a system that wasnt designed for it in the first place. As an analogy, I tend to view it as "Re-arranging the furniture on board an already-doomed Titanic"

Just like the above, any kind of distributed technology will always catch my attention. Once we get the intrinsics of the plumbings out-of-the-way (which I think may take some more years), I would love to see personal-portable computing. The ideal would be the concept of portable codes embedded in a chip that makes full use of the entire meshgrid infrastructure (again, a few more years to hit mainstream use once the vendors get their act together). With that, you can download your entire desktop workstation to wherever you are by carrying a small chip. There are pieces of it available today - but the entire picture would take some years to piece together.

4. If you are trapped on an island without network connectivity, what would you like to bring? Who would you like to be on the same island?
All the books I couldnt read because I have network connectivity ;) And on an deserted island where all dimensions of stimulation is key, there is no one else I would like to bring with except my wife and kid :)

5. What words of wisdom would you give to fellow user group leaders?
Stay with that burning passion that brought you there in the first place. If you stay true to that void of any distractions, only good things can result. The journey itself and the people you meet along the way is, most of the time, the ultimate reward itself. That said, do remember that great leaders look ahead of their time and one of the key things they do is to prepare, mentor and groom the next generation.

Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:19:27 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Friday, July 07, 2006

    Blasphemy ...

    It is finally published. After many, many, and I mean, many months of paying the process tax for this piece, it is finally LIVE !

    I started this piece with the first ever March 2005 CTP of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, previously - Indigo) and I went through so many port demos and edit document cycles its so unbelievably painful ...

    But it is really good to see this in online form and shape.

    I started with this idea even though MSFT Corp has explicity stated that it will not support any form of interoperability between WSE 2.0 and WCF, even though it is "theoretically possible to develop Web services using WSE 2.0 in such a way that they can interoperate with WSE 3.0 (and WCF) by using only a reduced set of specifications"

    More importantly, the main reason for the motivation to write such a piece is written in the article itself and I quote:

    [BEGIN QUOTE]


    ...WSE 2.0 has seen 3 service pack releases since its official launch in 2004. It implemented the OASIS Web Services Security 1.0 specification which was the widely accepted interoperability standard protocols between secured web services as well as the implementations of WS-Addressing, WS-SecureConversation and WS-Trust. It was integrated very nicely into Visual Studio 2003. Even BizTalk Server 2004 carries with it a WSE 2.0 adapter for securing of Web Services. Thus, it would be fair to assume that there is more than its fair share of implementations in the market today.

     

    Depending on timing, budget, complexity and a whole host of other requirements, some of these applications will need to be moved and migrated to WSE3.0 and some to WCF. Aaron Skonnard has provided a great resource in his “Service Station” column on MSDN on a brief overview on the migration of WSE 2.0 applications to WSE 3.0 ones. However, as stated in his article, there are some major changes in the programming model and architecture in WSE 3.0 and migrating them from WSE 2.0 may not be trivial.

    Another very important factor to take note is while WinFX, and therefore WCF, is available downstream from Windows Vista to Windows 2003 and Windows XP. That is as far down as it goes. There still exists a huge installed base of Windows 2000 Servers out there running on server and data farms and if you need to implement the advanced Web Services stacks on those servers, WSE is still a very important strategy you cannot ignore.

    As noted in the above guidelines, even though Microsoft will not guarantee interoperability between WSE 2.0 and WCF, the good news is that there are a few WSE 2.0 common scenarios, which can allow wire-interoperability with WCF. I will illustrate them in the next section...


    [END QUOTE]

     

    So, this article will outlined WHAT that reduced set of specifications are and HOW to go about using them.

    Many Special Thanks go to Kirill, the Interop PM on WCF, who gave me a couple of tips to get over the port-over humps I had thoughout this piece since last year. And of course, I cannot forget Clemens, who is the catalyst to making this publication happen when he came onboard.

    I hope this helps at least someone out there. Enjoy !

    Friday, July 07, 2006 6:11:57 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Saturday, March 04, 2006

    SWMWCFonTSS1.JPG

    As mentioned here, here is the another article on TheServerSide.NET that I wrote.

    SPONSOR.jpg
    After mcdst, professionals who are interested in comptia certification or another ccda and mcts usually have one goal in mind, to become an mcitp and in this context testking helps them.

    The security features and options mentioned in the above piece are not exhaustive. In fact, it is far from being exhaustive. I will be writing more on those other features and options, either through this blog channel or one of those sites I mentioned.

    Stay tuned for it. Enjoy.

    Friday, March 03, 2006 4:09:32 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Wednesday, March 01, 2006

    TheServerSide.NET, which serves the Enterprise .NET Community, has picked up on a previous piece I wrote earlier here with regards to Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, previously - Indigo).

    Expect more Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, previously - Indigo) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) articles to come from me on the TheServerSide.NET as well as MSDN online.

    Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:23:03 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Friday, December 02, 2005

    I was approached to write about Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, previously - Indigo) a while back for SearchVB.com, a member of TechTarget.com.

    Between a few new transitional CTP drops and major Microsoft events, I managed to hack out a simple piece here targetted at entry WCF-VB developers. There is another intermediate one (that deals with security) which will appear slightly later on TechTarget.com. Stay tuned to this space for further updates.

    Do take note that this piece is currently one of the very few out there that is written against one of the latest WCF versions (The Sept-CTP WinFX drop).

    Enjoy and send those comments over.

    Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:05:28 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Monday, May 09, 2005

    I was recently quoted in the press talking about OSS vs. proprietary platforms and solutions. It appeared in the IT Lifestyle Section (Digital Life) of our national newspaper --- The Straits Times 03 May 2005

    I had said, and I quote:

    ... mutivendor expertise and support may be hard to come by for Linux and OSS. And these can add up to a higher total cost of ownership compared to pre-packaged Windows ...

    Please click here to see the exact article in pdf form.

    MyQuoteInThePress

    Monday, May 09, 2005 9:52:32 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Wednesday, May 04, 2005

    Ian Yates interviewed me for what turns me on for MSDN Magazine SEA Edition. Read about it here.
    © MSDN Magazine SEA Edition

    Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:26:50 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Friday, March 18, 2005

    I know I have not been posting some real technical stuff on my blog for the last few months...and this is the reason why.

    It started off with a Proof-of-Concept I was working on and some thoughts on WS-Security Headers here. Finally, after months of hard work and long review and edit cycles, one of my 'masterpiece' articles has made it to MSDN Web Services Center. From what I understand from MSFT-Singapore, it is the first time a Singapore Flag is flown on MSDN. Gotta like that. Cool...

    Do check it out here and let me know what you think.

    While this architectural setup may come across as 'complicated' and slightly 'unorthodox' in the real world today, I believe we will see more and more setups of this model as we go along with the wide-acceptance of (standards-based) messaging-based systems in the enterprise mainstream. Key-word here is standards-based. Another thing that I believe will happen with Service-Orientation is that this routing/gateway style approach will become the primary extensibility model.

    Indigo will go a long way in making this happen and I am very excited with the impending launch of it this year. Incidentally, the March CTP Bits of Indigo and Avalon is available to MSDN Subscribers and I believe to the general public soon. Keep your eyes out for it.

    What's next ? I will be crossing over to do more Indigo stuff and there are work assignments for me that is revolved around Indigo-WSE-SOAP. I will update here as we (me, Indigo-bits, WSE*-bits) go along.

    Thanks a million to MattP, MarkF and HerveyW for helping me out with this write-up ... and Sorry, Matt for the constant bombardment of emails and queries.

    Friday, March 18, 2005 12:54:11 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Friday, March 04, 2005
    Benjamin Mitchell has written a great article on "Why WSE". On the same note, I have a similar one here.
    Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:43:10 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions

  •  Wednesday, January 19, 2005

    If you are reading this, I am already successfully migrated to dasBlog 1.7.5016.0. There are so many wonderful enhancements to this version. I especially love the Anti-Spam features of it via the Captcha image Comment Post and the ReferralSpam blacklist.

    Incidentally, I had written up an article on DevX before on "Spoof-Proofing your Logins" here. Do check it out.

    Thanks Mr Computer Zen, Scott Hanselman for the excellent contributions to this project.

    Trust me, I wasted no time in drawing up the referral blacklist. The much-desired feature of allowing the author to draft up a blog post first before publishing it (IsPublic = true) is also here now.

    Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:19:53 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Disclaimer 
  • Blog reactions